> Have you ever seen these photos of Ali and Klitschkos? Don't you think Ali would be too small to beat the Klitschkos

Have you ever seen these photos of Ali and Klitschkos? Don't you think Ali would be too small to beat the Klitschkos

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
Don't listen to Ray, son! He's a confirmed black racist who always tries to belittle white boxers. You got it right. I don't see what Parkinson got to do with Ali's height. So what this fool is trying to say? That parkinson stole inches from Ali's height or made his reach any less? The photo you're showing here and which I had never seen before shows clearly what I always thought: Ali would stand no chance against both Klitschkos. He is just too darn small to begin with. And don't let Ray and them racist folks fool you with this **** they keep saying "If Sanders or Purity could beat Klitschko, imagine what Ali would do to him" this bullshit of an excuse has failed a long time ago since it can apply for any boxer in history, but you won't hear them saying so for the likes of Jack Johnson, Sam Langford, Marvin Hagler and many other blacks boxers who lost to some bums early in their career. Wladimir wasn't during his prime when he lost and that's a fact. Truth is during his prime has been unbeaten and no Ali could beat him either!

I must say though that it makes me really happy seeing more and more once brainwashed white folks waking up and getting things straight. A few years back sites like eastsideboxing and boxingscene were full of wiggers who wouldn't give a chance to any Klitschko in such hypothetical question. Nowadays it looks like more than half will tell you straight forward that Ali has no chance against the Klitschkos in their comments. Same applies for Kovalev, Golovkin and many other white boxers.

Wladimir by wide UD and Vitali by TKO in the 9th.

Yeah, Kimbo is too big for him too.

If size mattered, then Valuev, and Henry Akiwande, would of been champions for years. Also to the people that think that matters, Niether Klitscko would have a reach advantage on Ali. They are short armed.

The Klitschko's have a huge disadvantage, when it comes to skills in boxing, when comparing, them to Ali. Watch the films, and the fights, and then realize, Klitschko's era, is the worst it has been all time, by far. Then realize when your watching the films realize 90%, of Ali's opponents are hall of famers, greats, where Whladimir has faced 0 greats, zero. Vitali faced a old Lewis, and was TKO'd. Comparing the Klitschko's to Ali is a complete disgrace to boxing. Saying Ali wouldn't have a chance, is an embarrassment. The Klitscko's look really good against complete cans. What if 10 of their opponents were greats, some legends, in their primes. Something they never seen before. The Klitschko's wouldn't of had a belt in Ali's era, and wouldn't of in the early 90's either. I know a prime Lewis was too much for them, and so was Holyfield, Bowe, and Tyson as well.

In reality the Klitschko's have 0% chance of beating a prime Ali.

Listen, buddy, size doesn't matter in boxing. What matters is reach. That's why Tommy Burns could compete in the heavyweight competition(standing only 5ft 7in, compared to his 73in reach). Imagine a T-Rex with his short arms fighting a gorilla, not using his head, he would have no chance to beat the gorilla, cause of his short arms. The length of the arms defines how close your enemy can come to you or how far you can make him stand. Close enough, your size brings you nothing against a smaller fighter, as long as he can reach your head, only your reach can help you to keep him at bay. Yeah, the Klitschkos are bigger and taller than Ali, but Ali beat Sonny Liston, whose 84in reach is longer than any of the arms of the Klitschkos. In boxing this means that Sonny Liston was taller than the Klitschkos(reach is everything that matters when it comes to size!) and Ali could still beat him.

Ali had a great chin and was the fastest heavyweight I have ever seen.

If he could avoid being knocked out he would stop these guys before round ten. They both have endurance problems and he would take them into deep water and drown them.

Boxing is much more than who is the strongest guy in the ring.

Of course Ali looks like a bum in the photo.

He was 65 years old & with Parkinsons when the photo was taken.



For a better assesment look at David Haye & Wladimir photos.

David Haye was about the same dimentions as Ali & David Haye held his own.



Haye is not half the fighter Ali was.



Additional;



Muhammad Ali is still a 65 year old with Parkinson in that photo & ''he looks like a bum'' is your only reference?

SMH



DKB if you truly are a boxing fan you should know that judges score cards is no proper way to make an analysis on a fight.

The fact is that Wladimir only landed an average of 5 more punches per round than he absorbed against David Haye. Haye, who isn't half the fighter Ali was, gave Wladimir a tough fight.



ps; there were always big heavyweights. The biggest undisputed heavyweight champion ever weighed 270lbs of muscle, had a whopping 4'' reach advantage on Wladimir & fought in the 1930's here is a photo; http://vi.sualize.us/primo_carnera_train...



Should i find a picture of a 65 year old crouched midget Joe Louis on a wheelchair and say that Louis would never beat that 270lbs of muscle?

Wait too late, the much smaller Louis knocked his *** out in the late 30's.

The klits have no chin or heart. Ali does and have better natural skills.

First off, let me say that I have been Ali's biggest fan from a really young age and I used to believe until recently that both Klitschkos would stand no chance against him whatsoever. A friend of mine however, emailed me this photo a few days ago (he's all over Klitschko's d*kc) and I realized by a visual document something that I couldn't picture before. DAYUM!!!!! Ali is really small compared to both Klitschkos. How could he ever reach them to do any damage? Plus Ali was not a hard hitter.

Hate to say this but Ali looks like all these "bums" both Klitshckos keep beating for ages. Check this out, dude!