> Boxing: The Ring's expert poll of the top 20 fighters of the modern era?

Boxing: The Ring's expert poll of the top 20 fighters of the modern era?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
Ali and Louis represent the best of the heavyweights and while Marciano did not compare well with the two, his undefeated 49-0 record was just too formidable to ignore. Despite not winning a world title at 175 lbs.,Ezzard Charles is regarded as the best light heavyweight ever while who could argue against the merit of the Ole Mongoose Moore? There is also no arguing against the inclusion of Roy Jones Jr. either as the best super middleweight or light heavyweight. Robinson, Monzon Hagler and Hopkins are definitely the best middleweights of all time. Ray Leonard together with Henry Armstrong, Roberto Duran and Floyd Mayweather Jr. represent the best of the welterweights. Duran with Ike Williams also represent the best of the lightweights with both winning the welterweight title straight from lightweight. JC Chavez just barely missed winning the welterweight title from Pernell Whitaker who had also won titles ta 135 and 140 lbs. Pep and Saddler well represent the featherweights. And of course, who better to represent the lighter weights than Eder Joffre?

I have no arguments about the experts' undisputed expert choices!

The criteria is no fights before 1943 so that eliminates Jack Johnson Joe Walcott Barbados Stanley Ketchel and Bob Fitzsimmons.

1 Sugar Ray Robinson

2. Henry Armstrong

3. Roberto Duran

4.Julio Cesar Chavez

5.Archie Moore

6.Ricardo Lopez

7.Willie Pep

8. Marvin Hagler

9.Sandy Saddler

10. Eder Jofre

11. Carlos Monzon

12.Ray Leonard

13.Roy Jones Jr.

14.Pernell Whitaker

15.Muhammad Ali

16. Wilfredo Gomez

17.Ike Williams

18. Alexis Arguello

19. Rocky Marciano

20. Joe Louis

Being this list begins with 1943 Louis had his best years in the 1930s. That is why I put him at the bottom. I tried to list the best fighters of various countries and also men who were pound for pound title holders in there careers. I score the great heavyweights lower. The reason being the heavyweight division over the years has not generally and historically been a great division. The lighter weights are all around better fighters. As I said in other forums Floyd Jr does not make my top 25 and I mean it. I think the IBHOF is a good list.

Sugar Ray Robinson

Henry Armstrong

Roberto Duran

Julio Cesar Chavez

Archie Moore

Ricardo Lopez

Willie Pep

Marvin Hagler

Sandy Saddler

I can agree with the majority of those on this list. I'm sure if I comb through it I might replace five of them. For the most part, I tend to view champions on how I feel they would perform In the Ring, as well as Historically. For that reason, I often have two separate lists. If you compare fighters of the same weight class, I tend to favor In the Ring over History.

.

I certainly think most of the fighters belong on the list. It's good to see Jones Jr. and Mayweather there because, if you're talking 20 champions, they certainly belong. Both tend to get short-changed by historians, partly because of Jones' late career losses and the fact that Mayweather is still fighting.

.

I certainly can't argue with the first six. I'm having a bit of trouble with Leonard being ranked so far above Hagler. Hagler lost their fight but Ray didn't do much in the way of winning it.

.

Also, if you exclude all fights before 1943, that excludes a sizable chunk of Louis' career. I'm assuming that any fighter whose career goes into 1943 is included.

.

I want to squeeze Salvador Sanchez somewhere in there but I must admit I'm biased and can't argue with those on the list. I could cheat and create a #21.

.

I'm ok with the list for the most part. However, I'm sure it's more of an Historical list because Marciano is only the 3rd ranked heavyweight, at #18. You'll never convince me that any number of people, who know boxing, would agree that Marciano would beat Klitschko, Lewis or Foreman in the ring. That's only to name a few of the post 1943 fighters he'd lose to.

.

Ask me in a day or two and I might juggle a few names, below 10, around.

Decent list, but what defines ''modern era'' in boxing?



When segregation ended? When the 10 count was introduced? When fighters had to go to the neutral corner? When gloves got bigger? When gloves were introduced? It seems to me the true ''modern era'' began when film was decent enough to make out what the fighters were doing [not that old film which skipped 2 seconds at a time, made fighters look like they jumped around].



All of these factors changed the game and how the game could be played effectively. Aside from that; boxing has always been a major money making sport attracting the best athletes, some who cheated, since John L. Sullivan made the sport mainstream in the USA.

I'd have Louis before Duran and no way should Marciano come after Saddler. I'd definitely have Hagler before Mayweathet Jr. too.

Good list though. Nice to see that people remember Jofre.

That's a hard list to make to many great boxers some of my favorites Ali, Chavez, Wilfredo Gomez, Duran, Hagler, Hearns, sugar ray Leonard , sugar ray Robinson, may weather, Tyson, marciano, hopkins,

No Larry Holmes? No Tyson? No Chavez? No Evander Holyfield ?

I never thought Ike Williams was one of the top lightweights, but otherwise I don't have a problem with the list.

not a bad list. dont quite agree with all the rankings. joe louis and mayweather jr should be a little higher

This means having no fights earlier than 1943 (per the IBHOF).

1) Ray Robinson 2) Henry Armstrong 3) Muhammad Ali 4) Roberto Duran 5) Joe Louis 6) Ray. Leonard 7) Willie Pep 8) Archie Moore 9) JC Chavez 10) Ezzard Charles 11)Pernell Whittaker 12) Floyd Mayweather Jr. 13) Marvin Hagler 14) Carlos Monzon 15) Eder Jofre 16) Sandy Saddler 17) Roy Jones Jr. 18) Rocky Marciano 19) Bernard Hopkins 20) Ike Williams

What do you think?

And no Sonny Liston either.

b.a.f.a