> Seriously.. The Judges in Boxing?

Seriously.. The Judges in Boxing?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
You are watching the fight on t.v.not live, the judges are seeing the fight from three different views, without replay.

It is common to have different opinions because of these factors.

I never think I know better from t.v. than watching live.

Quillins is undefeated and that 0 means more cash for Quillins and his promoter than anything Rosado can make them.

If Mayweather had lost his 0 to Castillo in the first fight [which he should have lost], he would have attracted far less because his invisibility cloak wouldn't exist thus they would have fed him to the sharks [bad matchups for Floyd].

Judges don't have the same view as us. They sit ringside and don't have replays to watch either. The 87-83 card should be understandable but there rest seem a tad out of whack. You have to remember, boxing politics are involved in everything.

The problem is that judges don't have the best view. Being at ringside is a much worse seat than people expect. They NEED to give judges monitors for better view.

Trust me, if judges would have better seats or a monitor, this fight, along with many others, would have much, much better scoring.

Of course, you still have to question the judges here. One judge had it 90-80. I don't care how bad a seat you have, it's impossible to see the fight that bad.

Al Haymon dude paying em off quillins one of his fighters

So Quillin vs Rosado just ended a bit ago

I had the fight 85-85 Draw

The judges had it 87-83, 89-81 like wtf??

Are they picking random people off the street to judge or some ****??

How many robberies have we seen this year? Its turning into such a huge predicament that I actually am getting really scared for the fighters.

Disgusting judges. Should be fired.

It seems like the only way to win nowadays is a shutout or by knockout.