He may not have a true prime atg heavyweight that he fought but surely longevity has to be considered and he still has some quality wins racked up. I don't think Huck does much for his legacy that's just a money fight but if he was to beat Jennings, Fury and then Wilder/Stiverne that would be 4 consecutive undefeated contenders (including Pulev) who are actually good unlike Pineta or Wach for example.
I'm sure he would be competitive in any era.
@Have to totallly disagree with you here Andrew. Check Wlad's record. Wins over Chris Byrdx2, Axel Schulz, Sam Peterx2, David Haye, Povetkin, Pulev and Chagaev. Not stellar but still good. He's just that much better than the competition that he makes the division look like **** like Joe Louis.
Top 30. He hasn't fought anyone who could be considered a great Heavyweight, even a past their prime great. People have been saying a lot of things about how Prince Nas shouldn't get in the HOF because he hasn't beaten truly great opponents, but his record has way better opponents on it than Wladimir's does.
Really? You think Wlad would beat Liston? Lyle? Bugner? I'd have to see that.
He'd make a stong case for number 3/4 I think. Muhammed Ali, Lennox Lewis, George Foreman and Joe Louis would be the only guys that could conceivably be rated above him from the post-war era anyway.
