> I am really, really pissed off 118-109 are you F ING KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!?

I am really, really pissed off 118-109 are you F ING KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
Sorry Flash. It sounds like emotion talking because you lost money. It was definitely close and it was a great fight. Both men acquitted themselves well. The 118-109 score did sully an otherwise good night for boxing, like the score in Martinez-Williams I. I think a rematch is in order, but I had Canelo winning 7-5 with an extra point for the knock down. I could definitely have gone 6-6 but Alvarez would have still won.

Remember, clean Effective punching, Effective aggression, and ring generalship. Trout controlled the pace but his punches were not as effective as Canelo's and his aggression was not very affective. Whenever Alvarez chose to punch, his punches pushed Trout back or staggered him. The numbers show Trout being more active, but Alvarez almost doubling him in power shots and beating him by 9% in jabs thrown/landed ratio.

Trout's speech was not rehearsed at all. It was just the speech of a very classy, but emotional guy. Look at his wife's face as the rounds proceeded. She knew that he was in the fight, but not winning. Sorry you lost money on it. I could never bring myself to gamble on sports. I know that some people say it adds to the drama, but I think it creates too much anxiety and it also decreases objectivity.

There's no doubt in my mind that you are the biggest clown and racist on this site by far. At least the very few times that I come to this section anyways, I am being obvious with my crap when I make "teasing" statements and questions ala Naomi vs Iman, you on the other hand are over 55 years of age and mean every single poisonous thing you type.

If jabbing the air counts as a point then sure Trout won, but if you were not as racist and watched the fight like an adult, you would see that Canelo landed every significant power punch there was in the fight and also knocked down Trout once and hurt him numerous times.

STOP BEING SO DESPERATE WITH YOUR RACISM. You are a grown a$$ man and your racism is not only sickening but immature too. You still get a pass for your blatant racism from your fellow racist little men on this site, simply because you are black. If you were a white dude and you were as racist, the same people would have had you suspended at least 50 times by now; just to get an idea of the double standards on this site. You guys are pathetic and that's why this site has died just like your American boxing is DEAD at the Olympics and real men's bigger weight divisions!

Flash, Trout got outboxed with harder shots. He controlled with the jab but it was canelo who countered with harder shots and making trout miss.

It was a close fight and I do not agree with the 118-109 scoring but this is no where near the robbery that people are claiming. Canelo is only going to get better and so is Trout after this match and I felt both fighters have learned a bunch in this fight.

I have no doubt these two will meet again.

The ? Should be who was higher you or the judge that scored it 118 109 for Canelo get the f... Outta here trout by five glad your not a judge 1 or 2 either way even a draw but not anymore than that I had Canelo by 1 point

I actually scored it 115-112 for Alvarez.Trout would have flashy moments but would seem to miss a lot and take hard shots in almost every round.Also if you didn't have Alvarez winning round 11 then you were way off.Remember just because trouts punches hit Alvarezs gloves doesn't make it a point

I thought the fight could of gone either way but I scored it 115-113 for Alvarez, I can see it going the other way around for Trout but I do agree118-109 was not any fight that I saw and that judge was clearly in need of showing how and why he scored the fight this way. Either way any one looks at it it was a good competitive fight that Alvarez got the win it was not a robbery but it sure was a heck of a lot closer that what those judges scored it!

i had it 114-112 trout, scored round 9 even...

close fight, could have gone either way, only thing that bothers me is that the judges never gave trout a chance to win which is disgraceful

you're a troll right? you think trout won lololol, it was like a redheaded stepfather teaching his son a boxing lesson. are you dwyer? maybe you're dan ambrose...are you just a troll here to make the real boxing fans laugh, because it worked, you made me laugh, thank you. the scoring was off but canelo won by at least 2 points..but everyone expects people like you to scream, "robbery" or "lucky punch" either way you'd be crying like a little girl

lol even if canelo knocked trout down 10 times..you would have said trout deserved to win.

I watch the fight in slowmo and trout did not won a single round...Alvarez is a great boxer...

Trout won this fight by three rounds there is no way Canelo won this fight . Why is everyone talking about the got knock down lol Trout got up and won the rest of the round 10-9 . You can not win a fight if you are not throwing punches. Canelo fought his a$$ off I will give him that and his defense was way better than I thought but he did not come close to winning that fight. Well I lost some money on this fight don't think I did not take into account that this fight was in Texas. Trout fought the perfect fight and got robbed Canelo no once pinned Trout against the ropes. Trout's jab controlled the fight . I think the pressure of the fight made Canelo tired this was a really big fight for him when 40.000 people come out to see you in person there is a lot of pressure nerves will make you tidier than the fight it self. Did Trout's speech after the decision seem to you that it was rehearsed ? I knew I had this fight nailed I said Trout needs to win every round.

I agree. the judge was too nice to Canelo but overall you should admit that he was better!

Youre just peed that the balck guy lost because you are black bias and racist. GTFO!