> What division do you think has more talent? Light Heavyweight or Super MIddleweight?

What division do you think has more talent? Light Heavyweight or Super MIddleweight?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
Which division do you think lacks talent and which has the best?

Given the fact that the best light heavyweight fighters of the recent years rose from the middleweights and the super middleweights like Tommy Hearns, for a brief while Sugar Ray Leonard, Mike McCallum, Roy Jones, Jr. Jean Pascal, Bernard Hopkins and very recently Adonis Stevenson, I would say, the super middleweights. The erstwhile top man at 175 Chad Dawson has now suffered back-to-back KO/TKO losses to super middleweights counting on his loss to Andre Ward previous to his crushing one-punch defeat to Stevenson.

The best real light heavyweight among the champions at 175 lbs. are GB's Nathan Cleverly and Beibut Shumenov of Kazakhstan but they have yet to test themselves against the likes of Stevenson, Pascal and Hopkins who were former super middleweights.

Super - middleweight does have a better combination of speed 'And' power, so I'll marginally go with Super - middleweight, but Light - heavyweight is a good weight division too, with it's own great traits.

Super middleweight hands down. Who cares about light heavyweight and above? Literally the most boring fights ever. And since when do you hear anyone talking about those divisions above super middleweight

Every category has its best part,as in the case of lightweight,they are very quick but have less strength then heavyweight.

Which division do you think lacks talent and which has the best?