> 2007 Oscar that gave Floyd a good fight vs 2013 Canelo that beat Trout?

2007 Oscar that gave Floyd a good fight vs 2013 Canelo that beat Trout?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
Hello sir. The Oscar De La Hoya that fought Floyd Mayweather wasn't at his complete best, but still gave Floyd a very good fight and kept it close with his aggression. A lot of people even thought he won.

Now the Saul Alvarez that beat Austin Trout was not too impressive. He did knock Trout down, but the win wasn't tll convincing. Still a great win for Canelo though, Trout is no easy opponent.

I agree that since De La Hoya is the more experienced and has way better stamina, he will win this fight. Alvarez is probably at the beginning of his prime, or not there yet. De La Hoya would win a very convincing fashioned unanimous decision.

The Oscar that fought Floyd in 2007 actually won in my scorecards. He'll beat Canelo who's biggest win as of date was against Trout. Yeah he beat Shane but im not gonna buy on that. As a matter of fact, im not yet sold on Alvarez. The light punching Matthew Hatton went the distance against him and there's no doubt Oscar will. I see this fight very similar with the first time i saw the Golden boy vs Hector Camacho. Oscar indeed seen the best and the toughest. I cant say the same with saul.

2007 Oscar that gave Floyd a good fight vs 2013 Canelo that beat Trout?

Even the Oscar whom Bhop nailed and dropped will be enough to any version of Canelo. UD for DelaHoya without leaving any doubt to fight fans

Canelo just because his age. Oscar Was able to handle floyd a bit because his style of fighting. This fight would look alot like what Pacquiao was able to do to Delehoya Make him look old and slow.

To the guy who thinks floyd Kicked Oscars butt Oscar would of prolly won that fight if he kept scoring points with his jab.

@David If Oscar didn't give Floyd a good fight it wouldn't have been a SP you dumbass. Oscar Did win quite some rounds and left Floyd's face swollen on one side. Hell even Mayweather Sr said Oscar won, though I'm not saying he did win cus he didn't it was a close fight. Quit hating on Mexicans you little dipshit Puerto Rican.

??? What fight were you watching? De La Hoya didn't give Mayweather a good fight. How could he when Mayweather was making him miss the whole time, landing accurate punches on De La Hoya. He was getting outboxed.

Anyway, I think De La Hoya would win because of the experience and because Alvarez fades too easily.

@David If Oscar didn't give Floyd a good fight it wouldn't have been a SP you dumbass. Oscar Did win quite some rounds and left Floyd's face swollen on one side. Hell even Mayweather Sr said Oscar won, though I'm not saying he did win cus he didn't it was a close fight. Quit hating on Mexicans you little dipshit Puerto Rican.

Was that suppose to hurt my feelings? I couldn't care less that I'm Puerto Rican. I couldn't care less if a fighter is Mexican, Puerto Rican, European, Chinese, or whatever they are. A Split Decision doesn't mean a close fight just like a Unanimous Decision doesn't mean a clear victory. Explain how Sergio Martinez got a Unanimous Decision over Murray? Why wasn't Trout vs. Alvarez a Split Decision? That was a close fight. Fights are not always what they are ruled. Mayweather clearly won that fight. If YOU didn't have your head up your *** then you would see that.