> Boxing: Why are some talking about Canelo's inexperience when he has 44 pro fights?

Boxing: Why are some talking about Canelo's inexperience when he has 44 pro fights?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
Including being in with Mosley, Cotto and now Floyd!

Actually ,Canelo has never fought Cotto ,he was going to until Cotto lost to Austin Trout.

Canelo may have been 44-0 but i guess a lot of people see quality of opponents over quantity.

dude, are you new here?

when it comes to floyd chosing his opponents... everybody is skeptical, cuz everyone questions how he "chooses" his opponent, man they even question his so self proclaimed greatness... floyd's forehead is full of questionmarks

the fight fans knew what kind of opponent would give floyd a hard time...

unlike you who is like a lawyer sticking on boxrec and write-ups alone when it comes to floyd, fans has the eyes to see, compare, analyze, weigh, balance things up...

fans saw how canelo did nothing up there, but you, you only saw floyd's kungfu boxing... fans saw how floyd was able to toy canelo, you only saw canelo's unbeaten rec at 44-0

floyd actually put canelo to shame up there... but nobody is buying that...

canelos 44 was against bums... trout who beat canelo was nevertheless still a bum cuz he beat nobody but cotto who was already washed up... and grandpa mosley? managed to give him a hard time???? wtf???

Lack of quality opponents, and 13 years younger.

@kool k

sean g must mean cotto's brother.....who is a c level fighter at best

Because he has never fought a boxer of that caliber It will be hard for him to comeback from a loss like that but who knows.

Because he lost.

Including being in with Mosley, Cotto and now Floyd!