> In your opinion, which boxers really won these fights?

In your opinion, which boxers really won these fights?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
Mayweather vs Castillo I: Close fight, could've gone either way. The official scorecards were definitely way too wide. I've scored the fight three times, I had Floyd winning 114-112 once and Castiloo winning 114-112 the other two times. So as I said, very close/toss up fight.

JMM vs Pacquiao III: I had this fight 116-112 for Marquez. I think Pac won six rounds at best, and that this was by far the most one-sided fight out of them all. I see no way Pacquiao won this fight.

Whitaker vs JCC: Sweet Pea got robbed. I gave JCC like two or three rounds, he got completely schooled and this was a huge robbery.

DLH vs Trinidad: Yeah, DLH definitely won this fight. He didn't do himself any favors in the last few rounds, but he outboxed Tito easily leading up to the latter rounds.

B-Hop vs Taylor I: On my card I had B-Hop winning 115-113. It was a close fight, but B-Hop took over in the last half of the fight and stole it IMO. I think I had him taking the last five out of six or something.

Bradley vs Pacqiuao: Pac for sure won. At best Bradley won maybe five rounds, but in no way did he win the fight. For the record I had it 116-112 for Pacquiao.

Lara vs Williams: HUGE robbery, Lara schoold and punished Williams. I only gave P-Will two rounds, it was a complete asss whooping.

BQ:

Winky Wright vs Jermain Taylor (my score was 114-114)

B-Hop vs Joe Calzaghe (I had it 114-113 for B-Hop)

Winky Wright vs Fernando Vargas (I had Winky winning 115-113)

Sergio Martinez vs Paul Williams I (115-113 Martinez IMO)

1.Castillo - no matter how i re watch

2.JMM at first watch (damn close fight!). People felt Juan Manuel won because for the first time he didnt taste the canvass. i kind of felt the same. It wont be bad if Marquez got the judges' nod

3.Oscar - Dela Hoya said he'll give Tito a boxing lesson. He actually did.

4.Whitaker WON - Judges just gave JCC's legend a chance.

5.BHOp won. But the boxing world thought Jermain will be the new face of boxing hence they still gavethe fight to the champion taylor

6. PAc WON - "There's robbery! Call 911!" Tim in a wheel chair just confirmed how he got lost badly

7. Lara for sure.

BQ

People always forget the Jermain Taylor vs Corey Sphinks in boxing robberies. This fight i guess qualified well. You can see the reaction in Jermain and how much he was convincing himself he won upon the announcement. "You should bring the fight to the champ! Not run around". Well, i guess Donaire should have won too against Rigo if that's the case huh

Mayweather vs Castillo 1 showed what it takes to beat Mayweather. The fight was close. I had Mayweather by a point. However, when I watched it again, I could see where Castillo could have won some close rounds. He certainly had the right fight plan. Unfortunately for him, it's not likely to beat Mayweather the same way twice.

.

Marquez vs Pacquiao 3: I had Marquez winning 115-113. It was a close fight but when I watched it again I still had Marquez winning.

.

Trinidad vs De la Hoya: I'm not the biggest Oscar fan but that's because of his personal politics. I'll always respect the fact that he faced the best of his time. The Trinidad fight was a terrible call as I had Oscar clearly winning 8-4 in rounds. Oscar not only embarrassed Trinidad but he exposed him. Every other boxer with even mild movement was able to beat him easily.

I like Trinidad better than De la Hoya but Oscar beats him every time. I laugh when people compare him to the likes of Leonard, Curry or Mayweather. All would beat Trinidad easier than Oscar did. Mosley's name is often thrown in as well. However, he's not that smart and I can see him walking right into one of Tito's titanic left hooks.

.

Whitaker vs Chavez: One of the Worst decisions I've ever seen in my life. I struggle to give Chavez four rounds. It STUNK.

.

Hopkins vs Taylor 1: Could have gone either way. I had it for Taylor. I thought Hopkins beat him the second time around.

.

Bradley vs Pacquiao: This decision was worse than the Whitaker vs Chavez call. I lost respect for Bradley. You could argue that it's not his fault. However, he admitted defeat right after the fight. Then he preceded to talk trash after receiving his "gift". It was fun watching Provodnikov bounce him around, only to watch him escape with yet another questionable decision. He gutted it out. I'll give him that. But somebody up there definitely likes KaBIGhead.

.

Lara vs Williams: Another ridiculous decision. I like Paul Williams but I think he should have taken an 'L' that night.

,

Other fights: Sadly, there are Far too many to list here. SOMETHING really needs to be done about the Terrible scoring in boxing. The system isn't bad but there are some bad judges out there. Maybe a five judge panel might improve things by reducing the chance for lopsided scoring.

.

I hate to think that any part of boxing is fixed. But you can't convince me that CJ Ross didn't have some monetary motivation for her HORRIBLE scoring in the Mayweather-Alvarez fight and the Pacquiao-Bradley fight. She should be banned from boxing for life.

.

Mayweather, coming from behind with proper adjustments to finish strongly and convincingly.

Pacquiao, as champion he deserved the benefit of the doubt in that close fight despite not scoring any knockdown unlike in their last two fights

De La Hoya, did enough to earn the verdict despite Trinidad;s stronger finish

Whitaker, not a shade of doubt.

Did not see that fight but I think Williams used his edge in experience to swing the cards to his favor.

Hopkins, by virtue of his being the champion he should have gotten the benefit of the doubt.

Pacquiao, despite a less than stellar showing.

Castillo by 2 points

Juan Manuel Marquez by at least three points.

DeLa Hoya 7 rounds to 5

Whitaker by a landslide, Pernell won every round

Hopkins by a point or two'

Pacquiao by a landslide, this one was outright robbery

didn't see the Lara Williams fight.

Added robberie:

Leonard vs Hearns 2 Hearns had two knockdowns and even Ray said he lost

Leonard vs Hagler

Lewis vs Holyfield

Whitaker vs DeLa Hoya (Whitaker won eight rounds and scored a knock down)

Felix Sturm vs DeLa Hoya, this one was outright robbery, a complete travesty.

Dave Tiberi won every round against James Toney and got robbed, this one was so bad it spawned a Congressional Investigation into Boxing corruption.

The worst decision in the history of boxing took place in Seoul Korea when they robbed Roy Jones Jr, of his Gold Medal, it was such a disgrace the U.S. should have declared war against North Korea again.

Literally every result I scored the opposite with the exception of Trinidad-DLH had it a draw.

Castillo

Marquez

De La Hoya

Whitaker

Taylor (only one I agree with)

Pacquiao

Lara

BQ:

Froch vs Dirrell : Dirrell

Beltran vs Burns: Beltran

Abril vs Rios: Abril

Ouintero vs Broner: Quintero

Ponce De Leon vs Broner: Ponce De Leon

Kotelnik vs Alexander: Kotelnik

Matthysse vs Alexander: Matthysse

Khan vs PEDerson: Khan

Campillo vs Cloud: Campillo

Williams vs Martinez I: Martinez

Lewis vs Holyfield I: Lewis

Theophane vs Danny Garcia: Theophane

Toney vs McCallum I & II: McCallum

Toney vs Johnson: Johnson

Ottke vs Brewer I & II: Brewer

Ottke vs Mitchell: Mitchell

Ottke vs Reid: Reid

Sturm vs Murray: Murray

Sturm vs Macklin: Macklin

Martinez vs Murray: Murray

I am a Filipino and I know Manny Pacquiao win again http://tinyurl.com/pm7vg5a

calzaghe hopkins was no robbery tho hopkins got a good few flush punches joe hit more and hopkins was being dirty

In your opinion, who won and why.

Mayweather vs Castillo 1.

JMM vs Pacquiao 3

Trinidad vs DLH

Whitaker vs JCC

B-Hop vs Jermain Taylor 1

Bradley vs Pacquiao

Lara vs Williams

BQ: Any other fights you want to add?