A mere con artist has fought better fighters than Victoria.
I think Ortiz is the more disciplined and all round better fighter and has the slightly more durable chin - but Khan has the power to knock Ortiz out - with a clean flush solid shot upstairs, im sure of it.
Problem is - in boxing, s**t boxers will stand still with their arms down and allow you to hit them with your best shot - i mean s**t boxers with crappy defences and footwork will get hit.
nobody whos got a good chin and excellent defence will allow Khan to make much impact upstairs and i'd imagine would test Khan's vulnerable chin out at some point - making Khan go on the defence to protect himself hence you end up with Khan a bit dougtful.
Khan is fast and has power - just wished his defense was world class cos then he'd be so much better.
Amir Khan most definitely. Khan was a decorated international amateur boxer and champion who won the world championship at junior lightweights and the silver medal in the 2004 Athens Olympics at lightweight. According to Wiki, one of his notable early amateur fights was against Victor Ortíz, whom he defeated in a second round stoppage.Khan even beat Marcos Maidana to whom Ortiz sheepishly quit in their slambang fight. Khan won and held the Commonwealth and WBO/WBA international lightweight titles before winning his first major world championships at junior welterweight by beating Andreas Kotelnik for the WBA title and later Zab Judah for the IBF title.He is currently the WBC silver belt champion at 140 lbs. Ortiz never won a major belt at 140 lbs. but gained a WBC recognition at welterweight by beating Andre Berto. He has since lost miserably to Floyd Mayweather and Jesusito Lopez by KO.
I gotta give Khan the edge over Ortiz.
Khan. Fought better opponents.
Khan, defended his title and held it. Never quit just got knocked out.
Both seem to have great potential, they have their ups and downs and seem somewhat inconsistent.
