and who would the contenders be you cant just give title shots to anyone,and they've held it over a decade pretty impressive at any standard,if you strip them who you gonna give the title to,and please don't say david haye or tyson fury.even if it is the rule my point is hes been dominant for years so to take his title just to then give him a title shot after he wins a fight or 2 and gets his title back would be stupid in anyway Business,you have poor common sense,just think after you strip him he would get a title fight hes been champ for years so what would it actually prove duh.
Rankings, title defenses, and fights have all been at the discretion of the sanctioning body.
That is, they have sold rankings and paid off fighters either to have them give up their right to a fight or made promises.
The saying that the only thing square in boxing is the ring is true.
When Don King had all the top contenders, he required fighters to sign with him to get a fight that would help their rankings, everyone knew it, but he paid off the commissioners. This has been a problem in boxing there are too many champions and no over sight.
The WBC #1 contender is Stivern. Vitali would destroy him. Vitali had a fight that injuries postponed. I think the WBC makes exceptions...like Floyd during his incarceration. It's not that Vitali was ducking or sitting on the title he got hurt training. The title should be gained in the ring...
don king
He's going a whole year without defending it ! , its about time both Klitschkos received punishment for only defending their titles 1 a year it's a disgrace !!!!
