> To all you Klitschko nut hugers does this seem strang to you?

To all you Klitschko nut hugers does this seem strang to you?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
It will be a great day, when you can focus your attention to the subject you are speaking about and at the present time it should be boxing. Racism has no room in the sport of boxing or anything, but you are so one tracked minded, always sounding like a broken record. Please let it go, and you will find that there is a big world out there, instead of your make believe theatre of racism. You remind me of the agitator cycle on a washing machine, when you speak of racism, you need to add the fabric softener, Downey, as you are on the agitation mode. You just want attention that is not constructive, to see all races fight. The Klitschko's are currently the World Heavyweight Champions, You need to deal with it, or ask them for a title bout. Do it in the name of Evander Holyfield.

The Klitsckos are very dominant. When Roy Jones Jr. was dominating the light heavyweight division everyone was saying the division was weak and it's the same deal with the Klitschkos.

Once the Klitschkos are 5 or so years into retirement there will be fresh faces with belts and the heavyweight division will be wide open and more competitive at the top and that is when everyone will be saying "i wish the Klitschkos were around to take these guys on".

Truth be told I have a different definition of what constitutes boxing greatness than a lot of others. I don't consider either Klitschko or even Mike Tyson for that matter "great". They have their strong points, and their weaknesses, and were in my opinion "good" but greatness requires "great" opponents and "great" accomplishments. The greats fought all competition, regardless of where they were from or their ethnic backgrounds, and not ducking competition was what defined a "great" champion.

In all due respect klitschko would ko wilder in a round,wilder has fought nothing but really low level club fighter bums,the klitschkos have disposed of plenty of african americans,Klitschko dominated wilder in sparring. you are a horn dog for racism like i am for food.

Well, the idea is to spar against the best so when you get in the ring you'll win.

Boxing is a sport, a science, but it's also business. It's an organized business on the inside where it is mist crooked, however it's very un-organized on the outside where it is honest.

Eastern Europe is still Soviet style unfortunately. Soviets never liked real comp. with the K brothers they don't want to box real fighters who have skill nor can move. every opponent they fight is goofy, scared or a scrub, plus the K brothers got weak chins. yes even white people see it too because they can not sell tickets in the USA, one time one came to NYC at MSG and got booooooed to death. people want to see real skill the average joe can't do. Rock Balboa is better than both of them even though he's not real because he has heart of a lion and is a real-like boxer.

good example is MMA Russian fighter Fedor. when he jumped to strikeforce he lost 3 time in a row.

Klitschko won't fight a young african american but he will fly them across the world to be his sparring partners .Now get this they fight their white sparring partners but not the Young I did say young black ones . I can these fake fighters be considered great?