Cotto Hatton and Khan all did better against Paulie than Broner. And they fought Paulie in his prime.
i think that broner is good, but he tries to hard to be like mayweather with his defence. the difference is broner gets hit whereas mayweather doesnt. broner has ability but seems lazy and looks more interested in posing and being the villian in boxing rather than putting on an impressive performance.
Broner wasn't as good as some people though, and Paulie was better than most expected, but the result was still the same as most predicted.
Broner is good
Overrated fighter
yeaah i agree and if he fights maidana Next his gonna get his *** whooped!
I knew this would be a close fight but everytime I mentioned it I got ridiculed..Broner is defo not the next best thing in boxing.
